The Irony: More Liberals Are Calling to End Freedom of Speech

The Irony: More Liberals Are Calling to End Freedom of Speech

Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski are furious with Trump at the moment and these are always bittersweet moments for the Never Trump Republicans out there. While these two occasionally make decent points, we are not sure why they are the ones who are leading the charge against him right now.

Weren’t they at least partially responsible for helping to legitimize his campaign 5 years ago? It’s like they want everyone to forget what has actually taken place over the past few years. However, some of us do not have goldfish memories and we remember everything that these two had to say about the matter.

Mika is having a really hard time with things. She seems to think that she has the right to muzzle the president when he says things that she does not like. In reality, freedom of speech gives President Trump the right to say anything that he likes about anyone. He does not have to clear it with hysterical analysts that are looking to silence him.

So what is Mika’s issue anyway? As it turns out, her problem with Trump is linked to Joe. He believes that Joe is responsible for the death of one of his own aides. In classic Trump fashion, he has even devised a nickname for him: Psycho Joe. He’s using his Twitter feed to re-litigate this case and of course, Mika is looking to silence him.

Does she realize that she only makes Joe look more guilty when she behaves like this? Sure, Trump may have referred to him as a “nut job” and insinuated that he left Congress quickly because of his guilt but there’s no reason to spend time complaining about a complaint. All this does is signal a certain amount of guilt.

Mika had better watch out before she finds herself being accused, too. Of course, those of us who have paid any attention to the case know that all of this is just window dressing. Trump is only passing along the accusation because he does not like Joe Scarborough and does not care about properly vetting his sources ahead of time.

That’s just not what he does. He shoots from the hip and asks questions later. The aide was not actually murdered, though. At the time of her death, she was struggling with a heart condition. She collapsed one day and died because she hit her head on a desk. We are not sure if Trump even knows this. He may be aware of the facts and still want to stir up trouble anyway.

Joe and Donald fell out years ago and this has more to do with Trump’s latest tweets about the matter than anything else. Once the president is no longer in your corner, he will pass along any bit of information that makes you look bad. No one should be pretending to be surprised about this anymore. It’s the way that he’s always done things.

In Mika’s mind, this has gone beyond a typical Trump dispute. Mika is now going to take the fight directly to Twitter. She is looking to have Trump removed from the platform entirely. Brzezinski spent an entire morning raging about it and she is even going to reach out to Jack Dorsey directly. For those who are unaware, he is the CEO of Twitter.

She is claiming that the world would be a safer place if Trump’s account was taken down. It’s a hard claim to make but that is not going to stop her. Brzezinski went on to cite tweets from the president of Brazil that were deleted from his timeline for being overly misleading. The Trump supporters are already mobilizing to defend their president.

Mika’s being called a “Karen”, among other things. What she does not realize is that she and Joe are not in any sort of danger. Twitter will typically ban those who participate in targeted harassment and they do not want anyone to feel discouraged about participating in the larger dialogue. These multimillionaires still have their TV show and they are not in danger of being silenced for even a second.

A major social media hub like this one should not have to spend their time worrying about what the president has to say on their platform. It’s a silly waste of time. Trump is not the type of president who is going to conduct himself in the usual way. He doesn’t vet his sources and he has no shortage of personal vendettas that he looks to carry out. It remains to be seen as to whether Twitter is actually going to do something about it.


20 thoughts on “The Irony: More Liberals Are Calling to End Freedom of Speech


  2. I am so dam sick of jacka s trying to take our FREEDOM away from us and all the other that our for father fought for if she doesn’t like it get the hell out of the us of a and live where they tell u to do what they want u to do. not me I want to tell any person what I think of them and the democraps are the worst of the ppl in congress. to loose our FREEDOM no way in hell

    1. ‘Dear Patricia,= and J Lewis,
      twitter is a private company, and can make decisions about subscribers and whether they follow a policy regarding twitter use. For instance, HATE SPEECH is not strongly protected by private companies… of which twitter is one. Do you have problems with Zuckerberg allowing Russian bots onto his social media site?
      Real governmental control of speech, even known lies, such as what Trump said about Joe Scarborough… has not happened, and the President has no limitation to his use of divisive hate speech on governmental and regular broadcasting media.
      By the way… the two handles between your replies, translate as “alcohol wet tissue” and “gaslamp’, both translated from Thai. Those two Asian bots show up all the time. Any idea why?

  3. She can’t do that who does she think she is God? because one of the main reasons the Pilgrims came to the New Land is that they couldn’t worship God the way they wanted. So the tyrants who want to change this and get rid of the freedom of religion had better study up on History instead of wanting to change it. If you want a shooting war then try to change the constitution or abolish it totally and there will be blood in and on every street in America.

    1. Dear Leo,
      I believe the narrative was on the subject of free speech, not freedom of worship. No mention of getting rid of freedom of religion…. unless you think Trump led a worship service on Twitter.

      Why are we talking about this, instead of asking for testing so that our government can open up safely?? It was promised lavishly and on public stations, starting March 6. So far, only the White House is able to get on demand covid testing.

      Ask for a unified and consistent policy about how to open up businesses and government. Thanks.

  4. The MSM has being trying to dictate to the american people and brainwash u like china for the evil left. It is time to stand up for ur rights and say no to socialism .its nothing more than communists with lip stick. and vote Trump 2020

  5. Here we go, shut down free speech, that eliminate the “Bill of Rights” and you will have tyranny and corruption running rampant. For a free system to function, freedom must be allowed to speak to the people. The first 10 Amendments are for the people’s protection to live in freedom from a tyrannical government. The founders knew that when a government became too powerful, there had to be a mechanism for the people to control this corruption. Eliminate the “Bill of Rights” and the people are enslaved to the corruption.

    The 1st Amendment is to keep the government exposed to the people. A free press was the 4th estate to investigate the government with out interference or control by any power. The 2nd Amendment is much more necessary to protect the people from a governments corruption by force if necessary. These are the most important amendments of the peoples ability to stand up to tyranny.

    My California ancestors joined the union in 1856 due to the peoples protections as in the “Bill of Rights”.

  6. To an extent I have to agree with “Mika the Nutcase”. She would like to modify the first amendment to exclude freedom of speech. I would also like to modify the first amendment, but I would eliminate freedom of the press. When the founders wrote the Constitution they had a very good reason for adding freedom of the press-it acted like an additional “check and balance” on government to make it absolutely answerable to the people. But, as the Democrats like to say when talking about the second amendment, “The Founders couldn’t possibly imagine the availability of semi-automatic weapons, so let’s outlaw them”, neither could the founders have ever imagined a press which served as the propaganda arm of one of the two parties, so let’s just shit can it-if it isn’t used to tell what’s actually going on and shepherding government to the straight and narrow, regardless of which party is involved, then they no longer do us any good and are a waste of money.

  7. What exactly makes leftists think they can eliminate the First, Second or any other Amendment? Congress (House or Senate) Cannot eliminate nor alter the first or Second Amendment. They have NO Constitutional Right or Authority do so, and any attempt by the courts, including the US Supreme Court to do so would also be unconstitutional That is why any and all gun control laws passed by Congress and affirmed by the courts are illegal and unconstitutional. First Amend says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof: or abridging the freedom of speech, . . . .’ ‘Congress shall make no’ is NOT a suggestion, in legal terms, it is an order. The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Again, ‘Shall Not’ is not a suggestion. There fore, any and all gun control laws are illegal. The individual states, though they have State’s Rights, cannot enact and enforce any laws, statutes, or regulations that are in opposition to the Constitution of the US. FYI, the National Guard of each State, is NOT the same as a Militia of the people. Congress passed the Dick Act to block or eliminate the people’s right to defend themselves against their own government should the government become tyrannical, which is the main reason the framers of the Constitution insisted on inserting the 2nd Amendment into the Constitution.

    1. Dear Archbishop Gregori,
      Perhaps Archbishop is merely a handle….? Or are you a person of the cloth? If the latter, what would be your particular interest or involvement in bearing arms?

  8. Dear Mr./or Ms. Valdez,
    The first ammendment is not to keep the government exposed to the people…. it is to prevent its over-reach.
    First amendment rights are actually not a part of the discussion here, except that whoever introduced this topic is engaging you on the basis or rage, fear, or some other dynamic. You are being manipulated. So far, in a free society, these privately held media companies can allow public access or use on a set of principals or rules. It is no different from you taking away the microphone at your
    next karaoke party…. for whatever your reason might be… because the mic is your proprietary interest.

    Thank you for your California ancestors and their understanding and pursuit of the Bill of Rights. My family were early settlers in Virginia and Texas, same thing.

    Have you given thought as to whether you are pleased with Mark Zuckerberg an his allowing Russian bots on Facebook?
    For that matter… are the first two or three entries Chinese bots, by way of Thailand, getting information on how to get Americans confused and fighting each other?

  9. Clearly, she/they want to turn this country into a COMMIE SH*THOLE…as if there WEREN’T enough of such countries out there already…..KEEP America FREE, it’s the ONLY one pretty much on the whole PLANET as is, if these other SH*THOLE COMMIE countries don’t like it then they should CHANGE their STANCE on keeping their People UN-free, give their People at least some of the FREEDOMS Americans have due to the CONSTITUTION…!!!! Why should America have to CHANGE and THAT to it’s own DETRIMENT…..I say, NO way, Jose…..!!!!!

  10. Mika you are the one that should shut up you don’t know what you are talking about you reporters only say what will get you notice even if it is a lie

  11. The demturds will go down. Americans are fed up. The turds think they can tell us what to do. I got news for them that they will all be voted out and under interrogation and all be in jail.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ad Blocker Detected!

Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website.
Thank You!