The State of Israel just announced it's filing a defamation lawsuit against the New York Times over a column so reckless, so dishonest, that the Israeli government called it "the most hideous and distorted lies ever published against the State of Israel in the modern press." Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Gideon Saar personally instructed the initiation of the lawsuit. A sovereign nation is dragging America's most self-important newspaper into court. That's not a strongly worded letter. That's a courtroom.
But sure, tell me again how the Times is the gold standard of journalism.
Here's what happened. Longtime Times columnist Nicholas Kristof published a piece alleging "a pattern of widespread Israeli sexual violence against men, women and even children — by soldiers, settlers, interrogators in the Shin Bet internal security agency and, above all, prison guards." The column was based on the accounts of 14 men and women Kristof claims he interviewed. Israel says those accounts were built on "unverified sources tied to Hamas-linked networks." Let me say that again slowly for the folks in the back — the New York Times ran a column sourced from people Israel says are connected to a terrorist organization, and they published it like it was the Watergate tapes.
Kristof also leaned heavily on a report from the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, presented to the UN Human Rights Council, which claimed sexual violence had become "standard operating procedures" within Israel's security apparatus. Because if there's one organization with a spotless track record of fairness toward Israel, it's the United Nations.
Now here's the part that really tells you everything. The Times didn't apologize. They didn't retract. Their PR department actually doubled down, calling it "a deeply reported piece of opinion journalism" and reminding everyone that Kristof is a "two-time Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist who has reported on sexual violence for decades." Oh, he's got two Pulitzers? Well that changes everything. Pack it up, Israel. The man has awards.
Except awards don't make you immune to defamation law. And when a country's government — not a blogger, not a pundit, but an actual sovereign state — tells you they're coming for you in court, maybe the Pulitzers should be less of a shield and more of a reminder that you used to be better than this.
Israel isn't playing around here. This isn't some diplomatic sternly worded communiqué that gets filed in a drawer. Netanyahu and Saar are putting their government's name on a lawsuit against the biggest newspaper in the Western world. That tells you how confident they are that Kristof's reporting doesn't hold up.
And let's be honest about what this really is. The New York Times has spent years positioning itself as the moral authority on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. They've run story after story painting Israel as the villain while treating Hamas press releases like gospel. This column was the logical endpoint of that trajectory — allegations so extreme, so incendiary, that even the Israeli government said enough is enough.
The Times can wave around Kristof's resume all they want. Credentials don't make fabrications true. And a defamation lawsuit from a U.S. ally with one of the most capable intelligence services on earth is not something you brush off with a press statement about "deeply reported opinion journalism."
Here's my prediction. The Times will fight this tooth and nail because admitting the column was garbage means admitting their entire editorial apparatus failed. But the discovery process alone is going to be brutal. Every email, every editorial meeting, every decision to run that piece over internal objections — all of it gets dragged into the light.
The paper of record might want to start budgeting for the paper of record settlements. As reported by Newsmax, this lawsuit was announced May 14, and it's not going away quietly. When a nation sues your newspaper, you've graduated from bias to liability.