Media Finally Forced to Cover Democrat's Sex Scandal — Democrats Respond by Rallying Behind Him Anyway

0
Media Finally Forced to Cover Democrat's Sex Scandal — Democrats Respond by Rallying Behind Him Anyway

After days of awkward silence and carefully averted eyes, the major Sunday shows finally — finally — had to cover Democrat Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner's sexually explicit text scandal. And the Democrat response? Circle the wagons, defend the creep, and pivot to Trump. Because of course.

Now imagine, just for a moment, if a Republican Senate candidate had been caught sending explicit texts to as many as a dozen women while married. We wouldn't be on day five of coverage. We'd be on hour five thousand.

The dam broke on May 31 when Dana Bash on CNN, Jon Karl on ABC, Margaret Brennan on CBS, and Kristen Welker on NBC all had to finally address what the rest of America already knew. Graham Platner — combat veteran, oyster farmer, and apparently prolific sexter — had been sending sexually explicit messages to multiple women. His campaign initially admitted to six women. The Times reported it was "as many as a dozen." His wife reportedly discovered the texts back in August. They'd only been married since 2023.

Oh, and there's the Nazi-origin tattoo he later covered up. And past social media posts about sexual assault. But sure, this is the guy Democrats want in the Senate.

As NewsBusters' Jorge Bonilla reported, the Sunday show coverage was less of an investigation and more of a damage-control exercise. The questions weren't "how could you support this guy?" They were "can you still win with this guy?"

Senator Andy Kim of New Jersey went on camera and offered this gem about Platner: "The character and the transparency about the different candidates is going to come out." Translation — he's not dropping support, he's just hoping the scandal blows over. Kim made it clear he'd work with anyone as long as they're fighting Trump. Standards? What standards?

Senator Cory Booker, also of New Jersey, warned that without winning the Senate, "we will continue to have an out-of-control president." So the math here is simple — a scandal-plagued candidate with explicit texts, a covered-up tattoo, and disturbing posts is still better than letting Republicans keep a Senate seat. That's the Democrat moral compass in 2026.

Even former Republican Representative Patrick McHenry of North Carolina couldn't help but state the obvious: "The guy with the Nazi tattoo turns out to be a pretty bad guy in Maine." You don't say.

Governor Andy Beshear of Kentucky, Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, former Representative Val Demings of Florida — they all showed up on the Sunday shows, and the party line was identical. Not one of them said Platner should drop out. Not one said the behavior was disqualifying.

This is the same party that told us they were the defenders of women. The same party that weaponized #MeToo against every Republican within arm's reach. The same party that demanded Brett Kavanaugh's head on a pike over an uncorroborated allegation from decades ago.

But a Democrat caught red-handed sending explicit messages to up to a dozen women while newly married? Well, he's "fighting Trump," so all is forgiven.

The media held the door open for days hoping this story would die in the dark. It didn't. And now that they've been dragged into covering it, the best they can muster is soft-focus interviews where Democrats explain why character only matters when there's an R next to the name.

We see you. We've always seen you.


Most Popular

Most Popular

No posts to display