The Networks Spent 27 Hours on Epstein in One Year — And Still Couldn't Find a Single Democrat

0
The Networks Spent 27 Hours on Epstein in One Year — And Still Couldn't Find a Single Democrat

One thousand, six hundred and twenty-seven minutes. That's how much combined airtime ABC, CBS, and NBC devoted to the Jeffrey Epstein story between July 7, 2025, and July 7, 2026. NewsBusters Managing Editor Curtis Houck tallied every segment, every breathless anchor tease, every "breaking development" chyron across all three networks.

Twenty-seven hours and seven minutes. On one story. Exposed on 219 out of 365 days — 60% of the entire year.

The breakdown by network tells you everything about who was leading the charge. ABC logged 673 minutes — over 11 hours — making it the most aggressive pursuer by a wide margin. NBC followed at 544 minutes, roughly 9 hours. CBS trailed with 410 minutes, still a commanding 7 hours of coverage. Morning shows accounted for 823 minutes, nearly 14 hours all by themselves. Evening newscasts added another 532 minutes. Sunday shows contributed 272 more.

Good Morning America alone burned through 309 minutes and 28 seconds. The Today show used 255 minutes and 58 seconds. CBS Mornings clocked 257 minutes and 53 seconds. Out of 52 weeks, exactly one week had zero Epstein coverage. One additional week had less than a minute.

George Stephanopoulos — the former Clinton administration official who now co-hosts ABC's This Week — set the tone early. On February 1, he declared that "the Jeffrey Epstein case has bedeviled President Trump's second term." The next day, ABC chief justice correspondent Pierre Thomas breathlessly announced "that massive release sparking new headlines by the hour."

By February 10, Stephanopoulos was claiming that former Attorney General Pam Bondi "refused to apologize to Epstein victims." NBC's Willie Geist weighed in on March 8, alleging that "the slow, selected, and heavily redacted release of the Epstein files only has served to raise bipartisan suspicions." CBS White House correspondent Ed O'Keefe assured viewers on March 17 that "this issue just simply won't go away."

It certainly wasn't going away on their watch. Since December 22 alone, the networks added 594 more minutes across 197 days. NBC's Ryan Nobles reported on February 11 that Congressman Ro Khanna was "taking to the House floor to name names." On June 2, Norah O'Donnell of CBS Mornings pressed Vice President JD Vance during an interview, urging a commitment to "push to have" all Epstein documents "made public."

Now, nobody's arguing that Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell aren't legitimate stories. A billionaire sex criminal and his convicted associate who operated for decades across powerful circles — that warrants coverage. The question is what the coverage was actually about. Twenty-seven hours buys you a lot of airtime to explore every connection in Epstein's orbit. The networks chose to spend the bulk of it exploring exactly one direction.

The counterargument writes itself: this is a matter of public interest, the documents deserve scrutiny, and the American people have a right to know. Fair enough. But 60% of all days in a calendar year? More total airtime than the networks gave to entire policy debates that affect every household in the country? The "public interest" standard apparently has a flexible threshold depending on who might be implicated.

For context, NewsBusters has previously documented that entire categories of stories — from classified document scandals to laptop revelations to border policy — struggle to accumulate a fraction of this kind of sustained, relentless attention from the same three networks. The issue was never whether to cover Epstein. The issue is the disproportion, and what it reveals about editorial priorities when the math is laid bare.

Twenty-seven hours, seven minutes, three networks, one year. The anchors kept saying this story wouldn't go away. They were right — because they never stopped feeding it.


Most Popular

Most Popular

No posts to display